Students

Chapter 1

Key terms:

community policing, problem-oriented policing, Compstat, predictive policing, intelligence-led policing, criminal intelligence, Operation Thumbs Down

Headings

Introduction

Reimagining policing

What is intelligence-led policing?

What makes intelligence-led policing unique?

A holistic approach to crime control

Case study: Operation Thumbs Down

The structure of this book

Critical thinking questions

How does the evolution of policing through community policing to intelligence-led policing match your local police department or personal experiences?

How much of a police department’s energies should be focused on prolific and persistent offenders?

What are the factors that have favored the emergence of ILP?

What differentiates the definition of intelligence-led policing from other models of policing such as problem-oriented policing?

Chapter 2

Key terms:

standard model of policing, New Public Management, risk policing, the demand gap, Kansas City Preventative Patrol Experiment, COINTELPRO, problem-oriented policing, SARA, collators, Policing with Intelligence, Helping with Enquiries: Tackling Crime Effectively, the National Intelligence Model

Headings

Origins of intelligence-led policing

Drivers for change

Data and the performance culture

Managing risk

The demand gap

Limitations of the standard model of policing

Organised and transnational crime

Technological developments

The US policing landscape

Fragmented and uncoordinated

Viewpoint: Intelligence sharing and the role of fusion centers

Demonising intelligence

The community policing era

Slow emergence of problem-oriented policing

Rapid emergence of Compstat

9/11 and homeland security

The British policing landscape

New public managerialism and oversight

Sporadic emergence of problem-oriented policing in the UK

‘Helping with Enquiries’ and ‘Policing with Intelligence’

The National Intelligence Model

Summary

Abbreviations

DEA: Drug Enforcement Administration

FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation

NCA: National Crime Agency (UK)

CISC: Criminal Intelligence Service Canada

ACC: Australian Crime Commission

RISS: Regional Information Sharing Systems

NJ ROIC: New Jersey Regional Operations Intelligence Center

COINTELPRO: An FBI counterintelligence programme

NYPD: New York City Police Department

HIDTA: High-Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas

ACPO: Association of Chief Police Officers

NPM: New Public Management

HMIC: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary

NIM: National Intelligence Model

Critical thinking questions

In what key ways has the development of intelligence-led policing in the US differed from development of intelligence-led policing in the UK?

While 9/11 might have galvanized the US towards greater information sharing, what impediments remain?

Is ILP significantly different from Compstat? If so, in what ways?

Chapter 3

Key terms:

crime funnel, National Crime Victimization Survey, Crime Survey of England and Wales, the dark figure of crime, detection rate, Philadelphia Police Department, chronic offenders, environmental criminology, near repeats, Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development, gangs, organized and transnational crime, scaling up factor, criminal careers.

Headings:

The magnitude of the crime challenge

The crime funnel problem

How much crime gets reported?

How much crime is detected and prosecuted?

How many offenders are prosecuted and imprisoned?

Case study: The role of crime in the work of the Philadelphia Police

The offender problem

Individual offending and recidivism

Problem places

Gangs

Organised crime

Viewpoint: Assessing the scale and severity of organised crime

Predicting prolific offenders

Can the police identify prolific offenders?

Summary

Abbreviations

NCVS: National Crime Victimization Survey

CSEW: Crime Survey of England and Wales

PSNI: Police Service of Northern Ireland

FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation

CPTED: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design

EU: European Union

OC: Organised crime

Critical thinking questions

Does the chapter make a cogent case for crime prevention activity?

In what way could the criminal justice system be most improved?

Discuss the major issues of predicting who might be a prolific offender. Consider both the operational challenges as well as the ethical dilemmas.

Chapter 4

Key terms

standard model of policing, community policing, problem-oriented policing, SARA, Compstat, broken windows policing, harm-focused policing, third party policing, problem-oriented policing, evidence-based policing, predictive policing.

Headings

Defining intelligence-led policing

Related policing frameworks

Community policing

Problem-oriented policing

Compstat

Related tactical or philosophical concepts

Conceptual confusion

Viewpoint: Policing conceptual frameworks from the analyst’s perspective

Intelligence-led policing defined

Original tenets

Revising the original model

Intelligence-led policing components

Summary

Abbreviations

IACP: International Association of Chiefs of Police

DARE: Drug Abuse Resistance Education

RCMP: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

POP: Problem-oriented policing

SARA: Scan (or scanning), Assess (or assessment), Respond (or response), Assess (or assessment)

OCR: Operation and Crime Review

GIWG: Global Intelligence Working Group

Critical thinking questions

Are the distinctions between the various policing strategies (POP, community policing, Compstat, ILP) as stark as suggested by the chapter? Explain your answer.

What theories of crime and deterrence appear to be central to intelligence-led policing?

In the last figure of the chapter, there is an overlap between ILP and POP, but it isn’t a complete overlap. Where are the main distinctions between intelligence-led policing and problem-oriented policing, and where are the commonalities?

Chapter 5

Key terms

criminal intelligence, crime analysis, intelligence, crime intelligence, collator, knowledge (worker, old, new), information, data, tactical intelligence, operational intelligence, strategic intelligence, the intelligence cycle, the SARA model, the NIM business model, the 3-i model.

Headings

Police decision-making

Awash with terminology

What is criminal intelligence?

What is crime analysis?

Data, information and knowledge?

DIKI continuum

From knowledge to intelligence

Levels of crime intelligence

NIM levels

Viewpoint: A practitioner’s perspective on the National Intelligence Model

Conceptualising analysis

NIM business model

The 3-i model

Can models reflect reality?

Summary

Abbreviations

ACPO: Association of Chief Police Officers (UK)

NCPE: National Centre for Policing Excellence (UK)

IALEIA: International Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Analysts

NIM: National Intelligence Model (UK)

DIKI: Data, Information, Knowledge, Intelligence

APP: Authorised Professional Practice (for intelligence management) (UK)

SARA: Scan (or scanning), Assess (or assessment), Respond (or response), Assess (or assessment)

Critical thinking questions

DIKI is Data, Information, Knowledge, and Intelligence. What is meant by the terms Information and Knowledge? Outline the differences between them.

Construct your own definition of criminal intelligence, and describe how you formulated each part of your definition.

Explain what you summarize to be the differences between operational intelligence and strategic intelligence.

Chapter 6

Key terms

modus operandi, community intelligence, confidential informants (also known as confidential human sources), authorised confidential human sources, information collation, intelligence requirements, opportunity theories, crime scripting, structured thinking, hypothesis testing, crime hot spots, harmful places, offender self-selection

Headings

Interpreting the criminal environment

Information sources

Crime reports

Community intelligence

Confidential informants

Electronic resources

Information collation

Information evaluation

Playing well with others

Improving information sharing

A role for liaison officers?

Viewpoint: The patrol intelligence coordinator programme

Analytical techniques

Crime mapping and spatial analysis

Structured thinking

Crime scripts

Hypothesis testing

Target selection

Threats, risks and harms

Crime hot spots and harmful places

Harmful offenders

Offender self-selection

Summary

Abbreviations

FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation

JTTF: Joint Terrorism Task Force

ABCI: Australian Bureau of Criminal Intelligence

ROIC: Regional Operations Intelligence Center (New Jersey, US)

NCIS: National Criminal Intelligence Service (UK)

CISC: Criminal Intelligence Service Canada

Critical thinking questions

Describe how confidential informants might be used to generate strategic intelligence?

Discuss the sort of criminality or crimes that the information from confidential informants might be best applied to.

Pick three of the organisational pathologies and describe how you might eliminate or reduce them.

It has been more than a decade since the creation of a National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan. How would you rate its success in improving information sharing?

Chapter 7

Key terms

front-line officers, police leaders, regulatory agencies, sex-offender registration and notification schemes, security networks, nodal governance, NIM intelligence products, security networks, VOLTAGE, Center for Problem Oriented Policing.

Headings

Influencing decision-makers

Who are decision-makers?

Front-line officers

Police leadership

Regulatory agencies

The general public

Security networks

Understanding the client’s environment

Working with the audience

Maximising influence

What can police leaders do?

Types of intelligence products

Viewpoint: A local police commander’s perspective on intelligence use

Recommending action

Summary

Abbreviations

GMAC PBM: Greater Manchester Against Crime Partnership Business Model (UK)

PIER: Prevention, Intelligence, Enforcement and Reassurance

SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic, Time-bound

Critical thinking questions

Make a list of security networks in your region, and describe what type of network they are, based on Dupont’s four types of security network.

Imagine you are writing about a positive and recently evaluated burglary prevention strategy this might benefit from becoming a city-wide policy. The target of this product is the city’s mayor. How would you design and structure your report and feedback to maximise the chance of influencing the mayor?

This chapter deals with the activities of two actors: analyst and decision-makers. What changes can be made so that decision-makers can position themselves for maximally influential?

Chapter 8

Key terms

crime funnel, crime prevention, crime disruption, crime reduction, primary prevention, secondary prevention, tertiary prevention, Kansas City Gun Experiment, Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment, Philadelphia Policing Tactics Experiment, focused deterrence, the Koper Curve, stop-and-frisk, offender-focused tactics.

Headings

Having an impact on crime

Revisiting the crime funnel

Estimating prevention benefits

Reduction, disruption and prevention

The changing leadership role

Viewpoint: The leadership role in intelligence-led policing

Steering the rowers in the right direction

The police impact on crime

Does police targeting of crime hot spots prevent crime?

Does increasing arrests reduce crime?

Intelligence-led crime reduction

Summary

Abbreviations

HIDTA: High-Intensity Drug Trafficking Area

NJSP: New Jersey State Police (US)

NJ ROIC: New Jersey Regional Operations Intelligence Center (US)

NIM: National Intelligence Model (UK)

Critical thinking questions

Imagine if a ten per cent improvement in crime prevention were implemented in the crime funnel. What are the organisational challenges that might limit the benefits of this crime reduction further down the crime funnel?

What are the general lessons to be learned from the Philadelphia experiments?

This chapter focuses on deciding how to impact the criminal environment, but argues that that many decision-makers/leaders do not possess the experience or training to be fully literate in crime prevention. What needs to occur at the “interpret” and “influence” stages of the 3-i model for selected tactics to be effective?

Chapter 9

Key terms

FBI’s Next Generation Identification system, Geographical Information Systems, canopy of science, President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing, information tsunami, New Zealand Police Policing Excellence and Prevention First, National Command and Coordination Centre, Real-Time Intelligence for Operational Deployment, near-repeat phenomenon, Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (2000, UK), surveillance commissioner, Edward Snowden, directed surveillance, intrusive surveillance.

Headings

Technology and ILP

Technology and the 3-i model

Interpreting the criminal environment

Influencing decision-makers

Interpreting the criminal environment

Viewpoint: Technology-enabled crime prevention

Key technologies in intelligence-led policing

GIS

Predictive policing

Social media

Ethical challenges of big data

Summary

Abbreviations

GIS: Geographical Information Systems

NZP: New Zealand Police

NCCC: National Command and Coordination Centre (NZP)

ROID: Real-Time Intelligence for Operational Deployment (NZP)

GISc: Geographical Information Science

ANPR/ALPR: Automatic Number Plate Readers /Automatic License Plate Readers

Critical thinking questions

How has technology improved some criminal intelligence processes and exacerbated others?

Are police winning the social media war with criminals?

What new technologies, currently unexploited or developed, would advance intelligence-led policing?

How can police protect the civil liberties of citizens when using technology and social media?

Chapter 10

Key terms

rational approach to crime control, evaluation, outcome and process evaluations, Maryland Scientific Methods Scale, realistic evaluation or scientific realist approach, Operation Anchorage, residual deterrence effect, Operation Halite, Operation Vendas, Operation Safe Streets, crackdown decay, Philadelphia Policing Tactics Experiment, Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment, outcomes and outputs, UK National Criminal Intelligence Service’s Organised Vehicle Crime Programme. Operation Nine Connect, Operation Green Ice, Operation Green Ice II

Headings

Evaluating intelligence-led policing

Evaluation concepts and practices

What are we evaluating?

Types of evaluations

Pure evaluations and realistic evaluations

Case study: Operation Anchorage

Viewpoint: Refining strategy after Operation Anchorage

Examples of implementation failure

Measuring success in different ways

A project outcome litmus test

Financial efficiency

Surveillance and confidential informants

Measuring disruption

Measuring success in changing business practice

Measuring success in performance indicators

Summary

Abbreviations

ACT: Australian Capital Territory

AFP: Australian Federal Police

DEA: Drug Enforcement Administration

RCMP: Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Critical thinking questions

Select one element of the 3-i model, and design a process and outcome evaluation for its effectiveness during a discrete operation.

How could policing be changed so that it can become more receptive to evaluation, and possibly failure?

Imagine a new crime prevention initiative (for example, concentrated foot patrols or automatic license plate readers) and ask five friends to take Ratcliffe’s project outcome litmus test. Explain any similarities or differences.

Select one type of organised crime, and consider different ways that its impact on society could be estimated.

Chapter 11

Key terms

Wood Royal Commission, New South Wales Police Force, Stephen Lawrence, Macpherson Report, principle of proportionality, Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 23 (28CFR23), UK Data Protection Act 1998, Bichard Inquiry, European Convention on Human Rights, Four P Framework for Prevention, ten yardsticks for intelligence-led policing

Headings

Challenges for the future

The challenges of covert activity

The risks of greater informant use in covert activities

Principle of proportionality

Managing criminal information

Human rights and surveillance

Viewpoint: Data, public safety and police legitimacy

The widening security agenda

Greater strategic application

Managing criminal intelligence and national security

An agenda for the future

Conceptual training for analysts and executives

Looking beyond the tactical imperatives

Engaging the next cohort of police leaders

Ten yardsticks for intelligence-led policing

Summary

Abbreviations

ACPO: Association of Chief Police Officers (UK)

28CFR23: Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 23

ECHR: The European Convention on Human Rights

IALEIA: International Association of Law Enforcement Intelligence Analysts

IACA: International Association of Crime Analysts

Critical thinking questions

Is a minor and localised infringement of perceived liberties an acceptable trade-off and tolerable if it creates a safer environment and (through a diffusion of benefits) extends the social benefits to surrounding areas? Discuss any arguments for and against.

Imagine you are in charge of transforming your organisation into one that is underpinned by ILP. Select one item the agenda for the future and discuss how it could be achieved. Briefly discuss what factors are inhibiting your selected item from occurring, and how you might be able to circumvent these.

Of the ten yardsticks, which do you think is the most difficult for police agencies to implement, and why?